DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
MEH
Docket No. 7547-11
27 Feb 12
dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27
February 2012. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 Ser
N130D/11U0736 of 24 Aug 11, a copy of which is attached.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. The Board did not find there was
an error in either the Separation Code, or Narrative Reason for
Separation, as on 28 April 2011 you failed the Physical Readiness Test
(PRT) for the third time. Accordingly, your application, and your
request for a personal appearance before the Board, have been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Docket No. 7547-11
In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN P
Executive D
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07547-02
In addition, the Board considered the undated advisory opinion with enclosure furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached. MMPR MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: Encl: ASE OF MASTER SERG MC (a) MMER Route Sheet of 3 Ott 02 (1) Military Personnel Procurement Branch reply to r dated 14 Jul 60 MSgt Reference Sergea in the case of 1. s requesting Master information as to why he never reached his goal of becoming...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07547-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. VOL 7BDODFMR 430101.Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMt4ENDATIONS IN CASE OF Issue : Whether law or equity dictates correction ofdecedent’s records to reflect election of former spouse SBP coverage?
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11936-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05848-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 PERS- 812 of 27 July 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant tc demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06742-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06575-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2011. In the event you now wish to request the alternative relief proposed by the advisory opinion, please resubmit a new application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02755-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were - reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, © together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00203-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your — application on 11 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01962-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04202-08
Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...